I don't think anyone really cares. It's UK, everyone knows you're -a- pets.Originally Posted by Algey
Well we finally captured a station, even if an A member was FC'ing. What that says about our pet status I'll leave to others
I don't think anyone really cares. It's UK, everyone knows you're -a- pets.Well we finally captured a station, even if an A member was FC'ing. What that says about our pet status I'll leave to others
The idea that I have "free will" is the only irrational belief that I allow myself.
If I am wrong, I had no choice in the matter.
i do believe Algey was trolling his own alliance, no need for you to make the same point in less subtle ways
Yesterday was great fun. I cba to write a whole battlereport, but we have about 18 hours of action in J6Q (including a rollback which added about 100m EHP back to the station). Highlight for me was refitting into a bait cyno carrier and pretending to 'accidentally' drift out the pos shields. It worked a charm
Anyway, yesterday we had temporary new masters in the form of ATLAS as AAA were chillin or something. UK are good pets to have because we provide lots of angry providence fleets to rape on demand when our masters feel bored
Genos joined -7- yesterday
Genos Occidere? the pirates?Genos joined -7- yesterday
THE GREATEST POSTER
Genos joining is not unlike when The Priory joined IAC (which was NRDS) in 2006 to help out against faggots like MC/FIX (who are now in AAA) in Prohibition.
http://www.sev3rance.com/kb/?a=kill_...d&kll_id=45862
:nonshocker: AAA are pretty bad at actual pvp.
pinoyzzz, are you the more bitter/more faggoty alt poster of Cippalapeallpaus?
on one hand :WULFPAX:, on the other hand good call by misty there to jam his own team and get on some kills.
THE GREATEST POSTER
Re: Antoshka
Go back to shitheap.
Them. The people who said they like Providence because it makes good hunting grounds for PvP, which is why they want to keep it.
It's okay, you can tell me how bitter you REALLY are.
let me guess, you define 'actual pvp' as ganking belt ratters, as opposed to less challenging persuits like capital battles or fleet warfare which actually achieves anything of substance
Guess again.
None of those 'persuits' achieve anything of substance because Eve is a video game. But if you're implying AAA have been recently good at those things, you're also wrong.as opposed to less challenging persuits like capital battles or fleet warfare which actually achieves anything of substance
9UY never fell, WULFPAX will bring down tripleA
THE GREATEST POSTER
You can tell that this post hit the nerve as the resident AAA mongoloid came to hurf blurf and Butter Dog rushed to suck his dick.
So basically two sides are arguing which type of PvP is better, one side likes small gang stuff other side likes fleet battles/cap battles
:sigh:
You talking about cock sucking sure brings validity to your statement. After all, that's what you do best.
Don't let Cippa troll you into defending Butter Dog of all people. Remember what the Russian violinist Jascha Heifetz said: "No matter what side of the argument you are on, you always find people on your side that you wish were on the other."
Well you seem to have a remarkably retarded and narrow view of that 'PvP' means. Anyone can link a failure from any alliances killlboard (and all alliances will have them), and state "lolz u cant pvp" - it's as predictable as it is intellectually hollow
Of course, its completely meaningless. If you want to hurt alliances, stop an invasion, invade, whatever, then you need to be able to do more than just roaming gangs. You remind me of my corp in 2006 when we roamed providence ganking stuff thinking we were amazing. We werent, we were just deluded and egotistical - much like yourself.
You are still deluded and egotistical. I was disappointed when you pursued better relations with AAA.
Not Dead, Just Sleeping
yeah, i pretty much lost interest in U'K for the same reason. that and butterdog's posting, they stopped being the awesome terrorists and became the smack talking pet.
(former kindashujaa member)
THE GREATEST POSTER
Butter Dog is such a piece of shit and you should just do what I do- ignore everything he says and never reply to him.
Butter fucking Dog in a nutshell:
2006 in ISS: we will crush IAC because our naplist is HUGE :twisted: *gets owned*
2007-8 in Insurgency: we will crush the NC because their naplist is HUGE and we are elite pvp *gets owned*- bonus being hated by his alliance for being a cumguzzling spastic retard
2009 in U'K: we will win in querious because our naplist is HUGE :twisted: *gets owned*
2010: same old shit
He's the quintessential pubbie hipocryte faggot retard piece of shit.
Come to think about it an alliance between Butter Dog and AAA is the most natural thing ever...
Christ... cippa, you're a bitter and deluded man if ever there was one
I'm assuming you are trolling and not actually as retarded as you appear
(lol @ comment about Insurgency having a huge naplist, i think our only blue was TRI)
in actual CVA-related news: One of their pets (FA) spammed SBU's in 9UY this afternoon. There was a small scrap where we came out on top, and now the SBU's are dying. But it's not over yet so maybe there will be more ~goodfights~
how many people in the system? Is it just UK fighting them or -A- and friends there
UK & -A- in approx equal numbers, we deployed a dozen caps or so, two SBU's down so far, system in our control atm
The SBU spam in providence is really odd, you suddenly get a small alliance dropping SBU's basically on their own, then another one and so on. There is no real coordinated assault, no planning, just small groups suiciding piles of SBU's.
Oh and did Butter jilt Cippalippus at the alter, there is more venom in that relationship than you'd find in a 1500 pupil all girls school.
yea it is odd. I'm not sure what they are trying accomplish by spamming SBU's and not defending it.
perhaps, they are trying to desensitize UK and friends. Eventually, they can drop SBUs and come into 9uy with full force. I don't know, its pure conjecture here.
I assumed that it was a probing attack to measure response and see if we've gotten bored yet. Either that or someone was very optimistic in their planning.
It actually goes along the lines of their "don't give them fights" strategy. It's just one more mundane task that needs to be done.
It's like Novocaine.
to be fair, they did try to defend the SBU's with ~battlecruisers~ V's 20-odd carriers and 100 man BS/support fleet
i dunno though, 1bn isk for 4 SBU's is quite a lot of ISK to many of the small providence alliances - for example, I know that Sylph are basically bankrupt at the alliance level, in fact I think the only alliances with any ISK reserves worth mentioning are CVA and Severance
For reasons I don't quite understand, we spammed SBU's in W9 today in an unplanned lulz op which snowballed from there. Some lulz were indeed had, we blew up a few e-ships as you do, but in the end Provi deployed a fleet of 120 and spoiled our fun, though we didn't lose anything apart from a few frigates afaik. We tried reaching for the batphone but there was no dialling tone
so you didn't lose the SBUs?
THE GREATEST POSTER
The first one just went pop, second one is expected to land on our killboard shortly.
well, we didnt want FA to be the only alliance today to lose SBU's in spur-of-the-moment op with inadequate support and 0% chance of success
Rofl. Please counter with some asinine bullshit about 'market pvp' like you did in ISS.
Actually the link was in the context of Genos joining -7-. However, the AAA killboard is rife with many failures against many more and less competent groups (Darkside, SoT, CH, BricK sQuAD. and even Goons) with varying degrees of failness distributed amongst AAA corps (that I will be happy to link). I would characterize -A- as a whole as incompetent, not based on a single link, but on the their intrinsic PvP ability.Anyone can link a failure from any alliances killlboard (and all alliances will have them), and state "lolz u cant pvp" - it's as predictable as it is intellectually hollow
*Blues half of eve to achieve something meaningless*Of course, its completely meaningless. If you want to hurt alliances, stop an invasion, invade, whatever, then you need to be able to do more than just roaming gangs.
Amusingly, that's basically what AAA's nominal PvP activity and mindset has become. AAA itself is satire (Against ALL Authorities hurrr, look we're so elite because we can kill RPers who have downs, lets mass recruit retards and blue everyone so we can still farm Stain, durrr)You remind me of my corp in 2006 when we roamed providence ganking stuff thinking we were amazing.
And now you're a deluded and egotistical pet.We werent, we were just deluded and egotistical
o_O
when did SoT fight AAA?
THE GREATEST POSTER
Some AAA corps came to Fountain when IT was hitting dropped SoT stations.
ooooooh yeah. i didn't think SoT did particularly amazing against them, but whateves. if his overall point is that (the persent incarnation of) AAA is untried in combat, i'll buy that for a dollar.
THE GREATEST POSTER
Maybe he meant the Russian SoT rather than Sons of Tangra?
Both SoTs v0v
I know many RPers without downs
You're either trolling or lacking in intellectual rigour, and to be honest I suspect both.
Is there a single entity in eve which has won every single engagement it has partaken in? Are you honestly trying to state that unless an alliance wins EVERY SINGLE FIGHT, that they are incompetent?
If the answer to the above question is 'no', then logically we can look at any alliance in EVE, link a lost fight and then state 'hurr hurr you intrinsically are bad pvpers and reek of incompetence' - the argument is preposterous, almost mind-boggling in it's stupidity.
You can do it to any alliance too. Name any alliance, and link their killboard, and I will construct exactly the same argument you just have by linking a few lost fights. The idiocy of your position is quite something to behold, but if you want me to show how it can apply to any alliance with equal force, just name an alliance and I'll do it for you.
It's kind of the opposite position of me saying "hurr hurr AAA are the best PvP alliance in eve because they are number 1 on battleclinic". Equally preposterous, equally hollow.
The bolded part is a great description of your forum posts.
Although i agree with that, pinoyzzz's post really was extremely retarded.
I'll just save that sentence, replace "AAA" with whatever Alliance i want to troll and spam forums with it.the AAA killboard is rife with many failures against many more and less competent groups with varying degrees of failness distributed amongst AAA corps (that I will be happy to link). I would characterize AAA as a whole as incompetent, not based on a single link, but on the their intrinsic PvP ability.
I too ride the coat tails of the alliance Im renting from and call myself amazing, ofcourse if we couldnt be on their ass 24/7 and love to take scraps that they throw us off the table we would be irrelevant nobodies with nothing to show.
spin in 3... 2... 1...
pinoyz is pretty stupid and BD writes in the tone of an aspie. it's like a manU / arsenal match, no one to root for, you hope they both lose somehow.
THE GREATEST POSTER
Pinoyz is a bad poster, I agree, but he pretty much says the truth, whereas Butter Dog is a bad poster and also full of shit. So I'll root for Pinoyz.
AAA is like a pitbull twice its healthy weight at the moment. Not in its prime but its hard to tell the difference when its attached to your leg.
Broad brush statements are fucking useless unless qualified and the fact its arguing with Butterdog just muddys the waters.
Not Dead, Just Sleeping
tbh, if you put forward a point, and you get cut-and-paste 'lolz butter dog' or 'lolz renters' type replies (how i wish for a genuinely funny or original troll
then.... well, you pretty much know you were right
in fact the number of bitter failed-troll type responses you get is quite an accurate barometer of truth
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks