Some of us are still losing![]()
Some of us are still losing![]()
Spaceship friends don't let other spaceship friends madpost.
Been losing EVE for six years, never stop.
Make T2 warp *scram* probes are 10km radius and require a T2 launcher (and graviton physics 4) to launch them. That'd give people that have trained up hictors some love when they fly dictors.
Won't void no longer have any penalties after this patch? Thought they were changing it to a bonus.
Thus Catalyst + Void = Muhaha... Mwhahaha, MUAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
AHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Edit: 450th Post![]()
Well besides all blasters get a tracking bonus so 50% tracking + 25% tracking - 25% tracking is still good.
The Colorblind Angel of Kugutsumen - Turning Bad Country into Mad Country one post a time
They're changing pretty much everything except void. The T2 missiles are getting their penalties removed, and all the short-range T2 ammo for arty, beams, and rails—quake, gleam, and javelin respectively—are having their tracking penalty turned into a tracking bonus. Hail is also having its falloff penalty removed (though it still has the tracking penalty) so now it can compete with Fusion
Don't see anything about the removal of pens on the close range t2 ammo tbh, other than the (extra) falloff pen on hail. The close range rail/artillery/beam ammo is getting its nerf turned into a bonus, maybe that is what you are thinking of.
edit - beaten to it.
FHC is much much worse in that regard. Never seen so many tears about people they don't know, doing things they don't understand, in a game they don't play.
I'm assuming you'd use your eyes instead of trying to read braille with your feet or however you attempted to read it the first time.
Fucking reading how does it work
would be epic, if the "leaked changes" turn out to be faked after the whole discussion :-D
Here's an Interesting Idea:
Edit: For those who CBF going back a few pages I re-upped the Pyfa CHAOS client to MF: http://www.mediafire.com/?hfop55cc2tuhcoo
Just used pyfa to draw up a gate camping tornado. 1440 scan res with a 5400 volley. It's still paper thin and I'm not sure if it'll track well enough to do the job but that's a lot of whallop for that scan res and it's still a lot cheaper than a Munnin and sturdier/heavier hitting than a Ruppie.
Off topic but not worth it's own thread:
What happened to Kugu today?
I too wish to know why I couldn't get my lurker on.
Spaceship friends don't let other spaceship friends madpost.
thankfully back up by the time i got my mormning coffee
I still want to know what the orbital hacker thing is? Will we be able to steal offline POS? Hack gates? Crash customs Offices into their planets? Covert shut down guns? Stop gate access for a short time or re-route their destinations?
Or is it something new for Dustplay?
http://www.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=3014
art for the gallente ship is up. apparently it's another model from the same contest.
http://fc05.deviantart.net/fs70/i/2011/150/8/8/naru_kami_final_by_baranha-d2yt8lk.jpg
![]()
Spaceship friends don't let other spaceship friends madpost.
Naru-Kami looks nothing like an EVE ship. It has a bridge for fuckssake. They tried to give it Caldari colors to compensate for the fact it looks like nothing else in game, but then they equipped it with turrets.
?"eve's a bad mmo, really bad, it's only saving grace is the people playing it, which i guess doesn't say great things about the people playing other MMOs"
I agree, the naru-kami (pretty as it is) doesn't fit at all. It isn't even close to the caldari aesthetics with those huge, clean and curvy plates.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/hChYV.png[/IMG]
"Every rifter counts friend" - VR
I just liked it cuz its purty, that's all![]()
Purty don't cut it - just ask Little Miss Vengeance. She's as cute as a button but she can't run and have tackle.
Only 5400? Considering it can fit 1400's with just a RCUII (AWU V), and has the same slot layout and gun bonus as a Maelstrom, means the damage should be the same.
I.E. 10.6k alpha, 589dps w/ R. EMP & 2 Gyros
Tracking is shit however, @ .0113
and this setup means no tank at all (1 LSE + resist mods = 20k ehp)
Raven doesn't, and the tempest doesn't have a bridge the same way a modern naval ship has a bridge.
?"eve's a bad mmo, really bad, it's only saving grace is the people playing it, which i guess doesn't say great things about the people playing other MMOs"
Hyperion and Dominix both have bridges. The problem is trying to pass that off as Caldari.
The nordic track or whatever weeaboo named thing that got linked above should have been a Gallente ship. I'd have named it Dicknipple Shitter, but CCP would have probably called it a Lorax.
T1 probes on a T1 sphere launcher have a 20km radius, so what is the point of your T2 variant?
T2 probe launcher could have increased rate of fire or reload speed.
T2 probes could have longer or larger effect. T2 probes could also be replaced with "de-cloaker probe" or "web probe" or "much reduced time, full scram probe".
All of those are bad ideas.
Well the T2 hic bubble has a bigger sphere of effect, so you might need to get used to bad ideas.
Bookmarks